Do we have a list of those Apache projects? On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
> Shall we start contacting Apache project that still use Log4j 1 with this > new information and offer them our assistance in migrating to Log4j 2 in > order to get ready for Java 9? > > Remko > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2016/07/15, at 2:36, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Where was the GitHub fork when it was EOL'd? Or when development >> effectively stopped 4 years ago? >> > > Maybe the hack provided in this thread will be enough for most folks. > > Gary > > >> >> On 14 July 2016 at 12:12, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> And get ready for a GitHub fork... >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree. We announced that Log4j 1.2 is end of life. We have a >>>> replacement that is better than Log4j 1.2 in pretty much every way. >>>> >>>> In my opinion we should >>>> a) make sure Log4j 2 is ready for Java 9 >>>> b) start announcing that Log4j 1.2 will not work with Java 9 so people >>>> can start planning their migration >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Ralph Goers < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That was exactly what my “mixed emotions” were about. >>>>> >>>>> Also, I think we are going to have a fair amount of work to really >>>>> support Java 9. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Any Log4j 1 release is likely to open the floodgates of requests to >>>>> fix any outstanding "simple" (or complex) bugs. >>>>> >>>>> Keep in mind that Java 9 is not official yet, so we could be opening >>>>> ourselves to a series of Java 9 EA compatible releases as Java 9 with and >>>>> without Jigsaw (these are still separate builds IIRC) gets developed. >>>>> >>>>> Tracking Java 9 EAs with Log4j 2 is likely to be enough work as it >>>>> is... if we do want to do that now... >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Strategically I don't see why doing another 1.2 release would be a >>>>>> good idea. >>>>>> If people can upgrade to Java 9 with all the regression testing that >>>>>> implies, then I see no reason they would not also upgrade to Log4j 2... >>>>>> Naturally Log4j 2 needs to be in good shape for Java 9 and we would >>>>>> support users who did customizations to Log4j 1.2. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Ralph Goers < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> That would rule out building on a Mac. I’d have to try it from a >>>>>>> Linux VM. I think Gary might have built Log4j 1 in the past. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matt, I guess you need JDK 1.4.2 on your machine to have artifact >>>>>>> "sun.jdk:tools:jar:1.4.2". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you even build log4j 1.2? I get this error when I build from >>>>>>>> trunk: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run >>>>>>>> (javadoc.resources) on >>>>>>>> project log4j: Execution javadoc.resources of goal >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run failed: Plugin >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2 or one of its >>>>>>>> dependencies >>>>>>>> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact sun.jdk:tools:jar:1.4.2 >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> specified path >>>>>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_66.jdk/Contents/Home/jre/../Classes/classes.jar >>>>>>>> -> [Help 1] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 14 July 2016 at 10:47, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would we want to do that? We need to make sure that Log4j 2 >>>>>>>>> works well with Java 9, but otherwise I think this is an excellent >>>>>>>>> opportunity for users to upgrade to Log4j 2. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Remko >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Paul Benedict < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> According to this poster, it appears 1.x is not compatible with >>>>>>>>>> JDK 9: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008654.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I told them I would notify our development community. So here's >>>>>>>>>> the notification. :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Given how widely used 1.x is still, what do you guys think of one >>>>>>>>>> more 1.x release? Usually I would never entertain the suggestion, >>>>>>>>>> but this >>>>>>>>>> may be the one time the justification makes sense. For those who >>>>>>>>>> still use >>>>>>>>>> 1.x and have no time to upgrade to 2.x, I can't think of a better >>>>>>>>>> way to >>>>>>>>>> support the user community than fix this issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PS: Inside the post is a link to the supposed patch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* [email protected] Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
