So yes, it does sound like we'd need a 2.12 module now as well. I'm not exactly sure how to best configure maven to do a build like this.
On 3 November 2016 at 10:31, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> wrote: > Since different Scala versions are not binary compatible, we need a new > module to support Scala 2.12 (that's why we have two modules already, for > Scala 2.10 and 2.11). And that new module will require Java 8. > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Oops I skipped typing the 8! >> >> On Nov 3, 2016 8:20 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This one will require Java 8 to compile. We'll need to update our build >>> setup to support it. >>> >>> On 3 November 2016 at 10:14, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Do we need a new module to support Scala 2.12? >>>> http://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.12.0? It does require Java I think. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >> > > > -- > [image: MagineTV] > > *Mikael Ståldal* > Senior software developer > > *Magine TV* > mikael.stal...@magine.com > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com > > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply > email. > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
