I don’t have a problem with it using the same groupId. Ralph
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we get a new git repo in the logging project for the Scala extensions > then? > > Also, if we use a different get repo, should we continue releasing these > log4j extras under the same group ID? > > On 3 November 2016 at 14:57, Ralph Goers <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Since we won’t be using Java 8 to perform releases any time soon I suggest > the Scala support move to a different git repo with a separate build. > > Ralph > >> On Nov 3, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> This one will require Java 8 to compile. We'll need to update our build >> setup to support it. >> >> On 3 November 2016 at 10:14, Gary Gregory <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Do we need a new module to support Scala 2.12? >> http://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.12.0 >> <http://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.12.0>? It does require Java I think. >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
