I don’t have a problem with it using the same groupId. Ralph
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can we get a new git repo in the logging project for the Scala extensions > then? > > Also, if we use a different get repo, should we continue releasing these > log4j extras under the same group ID? > > On 3 November 2016 at 14:57, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > Since we won’t be using Java 8 to perform releases any time soon I suggest > the Scala support move to a different git repo with a separate build. > > Ralph > >> On Nov 3, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com >> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> This one will require Java 8 to compile. We'll need to update our build >> setup to support it. >> >> On 3 November 2016 at 10:14, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >> <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Do we need a new module to support Scala 2.12? >> http://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.12.0 >> <http://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.12.0>? It does require Java I think. >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
