You just have to build with Java 8... we could use the animal sniffer plugin to sandbox the other modules to Java 7.
We could requires Java 8 for all of Log4j ... hides from flying tomatoes ;-) Does Java 9 talk about adding some new compiler flag to kind of do what the animal sniffer plugin does? Gary On Nov 3, 2016 8:55 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > So yes, it does sound like we'd need a 2.12 module now as well. I'm not > exactly sure how to best configure maven to do a build like this. > > On 3 November 2016 at 10:31, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> > wrote: > >> Since different Scala versions are not binary compatible, we need a new >> module to support Scala 2.12 (that's why we have two modules already, for >> Scala 2.10 and 2.11). And that new module will require Java 8. >> >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Oops I skipped typing the 8! >>> >>> On Nov 3, 2016 8:20 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This one will require Java 8 to compile. We'll need to update our build >>>> setup to support it. >>>> >>>> On 3 November 2016 at 10:14, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do we need a new module to support Scala 2.12? >>>>> http://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.12.0? It does require Java I think. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> [image: MagineTV] >> >> *Mikael Ståldal* >> Senior software developer >> >> *Magine TV* >> mikael.stal...@magine.com >> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com >> >> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this >> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message >> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may >> not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, >> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply >> email. >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
