Ceki has updated his numbers to include those reported on the mailing list. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cpb5D7qnyye4W0RTlHUnXedYK98catNZytYIu5D91m0/edit#gid=0 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cpb5D7qnyye4W0RTlHUnXedYK98catNZytYIu5D91m0/edit#gid=0>
I haven’t run the tests with Logback 1.2-SNAPSHOT but my numbers for my two MacBooks are at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L67IhmUVvyLBWtC6iq0TMj-j0vrbKsUKWuZV0Nlqisk/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L67IhmUVvyLBWtC6iq0TMj-j0vrbKsUKWuZV0Nlqisk/edit?usp=sharing>. Ralph > On Feb 6, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > Yes, that is still the standard approach most people use and is the only way > to provide a head-to-head comparison against the logging frameworks. > > Ralph > >> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com >> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> This is all in a synchronous appender, right? Either way, that's rather >> interesting. >> >> On 6 February 2017 at 07:54, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: >> Someone posted numbers on the Logback user’s list that match mine. It shows >> Logback 1.1.9 was pretty terrible, 1.1.10 is somewhat better and >> 1.2-SNAPSHOT is on par or slightly better than Log4j 2. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Feb 5, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I think we need some comparisons on the log4j side: file appender with 256k >>> buffer size, random access file appender with 256k buffer size (which >>> appears to be the default), and memory mapped file appender. It'd be cool >>> to see how these compose with async logging enabled in both log4j and >>> logback. >>> >>> On 5 February 2017 at 16:06, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: >>> You should run the code at https://github.com/ceki/logback-perf >>> <https://github.com/ceki/logback-perf> to compare your results to Ceki’s. >>> You also should capture the cpubenchmark speed of your processor and get >>> the speed of your hard drive. I used Blackmagic speed test on my Mac. I am >>> capturing my results in a Google spreadsheet. I will post the like once I >>> have it. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>>> On Feb 5, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> If you want, I can run tests on Windows once the build works on Windows >>>> again. >>>> >>>> Let me know what args/command line... >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On Feb 5, 2017 11:58 AM, "Apache" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >>>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: >>>> I guess my MacBook Pro must fit in the Slow CPU/Fast Hard drive category. >>>> With Logback 1.10 and -t 4 now get >>>> >>>> Benchmark Mode Samples >>>> Score Error Units >>>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.julFile thrpt 20 >>>> 98187.673 ± 4935.712 ops/s >>>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j1File thrpt 20 >>>> 842374.496 ± 6762.712 ops/s >>>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2File thrpt 20 >>>> 1853062.583 ± 67032.225 ops/s >>>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2RAF thrpt 20 >>>> 2036011.226 ± 53208.281 ops/s >>>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.logbackFile thrpt 20 >>>> 999667.438 ± 12074.003 ops/s >>>> >>>> I’ll have to try this on one my VMs at work. We don’t run anything >>>> directly on bare metal any more. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Feb 5, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >>>>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ceki finally fixed some of the performance problems in the FileAppender. >>>>> See https://logback.qos.ch/news.html <https://logback.qos.ch/news.html> >>>>> and >>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cpb5D7qnyye4W0RTlHUnXedYK98catNZytYIu5D91m0/edit#gid=0 >>>>> >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cpb5D7qnyye4W0RTlHUnXedYK98catNZytYIu5D91m0/edit#gid=0>. >>>>> I suspect we have a few optimizations we can make. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> >
