Thanks. I checked out the link. It seems they were trying to do something
similar to me. I see the last comment on that is that it doesn't work.
There is another post afterwards which uses the ThresholdFilter. However the
ThresholdFilter won't work as that allows, or denys, all levels greater than or
equal to or less than or equal to the level. I need to filter a specific range
of levels.
Thanks,
Nick
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0900
> Subject: Re: range filter?
> From: remko.po...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> Can you try something similar to this
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24695133/log4j2-filter-particular-level-in-apender/24697002#24697002
> and see if that works with custom levels as well?
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > I've tried a couple different combinations and so far no luck. Here's
> > the current configuration I tested with which doesn't work:
> >
> > <File ...>
> > <PatternLayout>
> > ...
> > </PatternLayout>
> > <Filters>
> > <ThresholdFilter level="INFO" onMatch="DENY"/>
> > <ThresholdFilter level="DEBUG" onMatch="ACCEPT"/>
> > </Filters>
> > </File>
> >
> > The
> > use case for why I want such a filter is to forward a range of events
> > to an appender. The threshold filter won't work because it will send
> > all events matching a certain level and lower to the appender. For
> > instance, I might want all DEBUG, TRACE and VERBOSE events going to one
> > appender. All INFO, ERROR and WARN events going to another appender.
> > All BUSINESS events (my custom) level, going to yet another appender.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:17:44 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: range filter?
> > > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> > >
> > > When you get it working, it sounds like it would make a nice addition to
> > > the FAQ with a description of your use case.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I believe two threshold filters inside a composite filter should should
> > > > work provided you have the onMatch and onMismatch set appropriately.
> > > >
> > > > Ralph
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm looking for a range filter in log4j2. I see there is on in
> > log4net
> > > > and it appears there was one written by someone for log4j 1. Just
> > > > wondering if there is something 'out of the box' in log4j2 that will
> > > > accomplish the same? I was wondering whether this could be
> > accomplished
> > > > with the CompositeFilter with two ThresholdFilter?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Nick
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
> >
