Basically I need the same functionality of the LevelRangeFilter in log4net, but 
of course in log4j2.
 
Thanks,
Nick
 
> From: nic...@msn.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: RE: range filter?
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:49:48 -0400
> 
> Thanks.  I checked out the link.  It seems they were trying to do something 
> similar to me.  I see the last comment on that is that it doesn't work.
>  
> There is another post afterwards which uses the ThresholdFilter.  However the 
> ThresholdFilter won't work as that allows, or denys, all levels greater than 
> or equal to or less than or equal to the level.  I need to filter a specific 
> range of levels.
>  
> Thanks,
> Nick
>  
> > Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0900
> > Subject: Re: range filter?
> > From: remko.po...@gmail.com
> > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> > 
> > Can you try something similar to this
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24695133/log4j2-filter-particular-level-in-apender/24697002#24697002
> > and see if that works with custom levels as well?
> > 
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I've tried a couple different combinations and so far no luck.  Here's
> > > the current configuration I tested with which doesn't work:
> > >
> > > <File ...>
> > >   <PatternLayout>
> > >       ...
> > >    </PatternLayout>
> > >    <Filters>
> > >       <ThresholdFilter level="INFO" onMatch="DENY"/>
> > >       <ThresholdFilter level="DEBUG" onMatch="ACCEPT"/>
> > >    </Filters>
> > > </File>
> > >
> > > The
> > >  use case for why I want such a filter is to forward a range of events
> > > to an appender.  The threshold filter won't work because it will send
> > > all events matching a certain level and lower to the appender.  For
> > > instance, I might want all DEBUG, TRACE and VERBOSE events going to one
> > > appender.  All INFO, ERROR and WARN events going to another appender.
> > > All BUSINESS events (my custom) level, going to yet another appender.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nick
> > >
> > > > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:17:44 -0700
> > > > Subject: Re: range filter?
> > > > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > > > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > When you get it working, it sounds like it would make a nice addition to
> > > > the FAQ with a description of your use case.
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I believe two threshold filters inside a composite filter should 
> > > > > should
> > > > > work provided you have the onMatch and onMismatch set appropriately.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ralph
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm looking for a range filter in log4j2.  I see there is on in
> > > log4net
> > > > > and it appears there was one written by someone for log4j 1.  Just
> > > > > wondering if there is something 'out of the box' in log4j2 that will
> > > > > accomplish the same?  I was wondering whether this could be
> > > accomplished
> > > > > with the CompositeFilter with two ThresholdFilter?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Nick
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >
> > >
>                                         
                                          

Reply via email to