By the way, let me say that I'm surprisingly delighted by the quickness of
responses and level of interest in solving these issues. THANK YOU. I guess
after posting a few messages on the log4net mailing list and getting no
responses I wasn't too hopeful about getting responses to my log4j questions.
I guess there is a big difference in support between the two products?
Thanks,
Nick
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:37:18 -0700
> Subject: Re: range filter?
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> Ah, yes, sorry, I had not read it in detail. It would be nice to expand the
> unit test I just committed with a more complex scenario.
>
> Could this use better docs or a FAQ entry?
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You misread the comment. The commentor basically told me the answer works
> > with a minor change, and that he would mark the question as "done" if I
> > would edit my answer (which I did).
> >
> > So the answer works and seems to apply to your use case, no? The question
> > is if it also works with custom levels.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On 2015/08/26, at 8:49, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks. I checked out the link. It seems they were trying to do
> > something similar to me. I see the last comment on that is that it doesn't
> > work.
> > >
> > > There is another post afterwards which uses the ThresholdFilter.
> > However the ThresholdFilter won't work as that allows, or denys, all levels
> > greater than or equal to or less than or equal to the level. I need to
> > filter a specific range of levels.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nick
> > >
> > >> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0900
> > >> Subject: Re: range filter?
> > >> From: remko.po...@gmail.com
> > >> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> > >>
> > >> Can you try something similar to this
> > >>
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24695133/log4j2-filter-particular-level-in-apender/24697002#24697002
> > >> and see if that works with custom levels as well?
> > >>
> > >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I've tried a couple different combinations and so far no luck. Here's
> > >>> the current configuration I tested with which doesn't work:
> > >>>
> > >>> <File ...>
> > >>> <PatternLayout>
> > >>> ...
> > >>> </PatternLayout>
> > >>> <Filters>
> > >>> <ThresholdFilter level="INFO" onMatch="DENY"/>
> > >>> <ThresholdFilter level="DEBUG" onMatch="ACCEPT"/>
> > >>> </Filters>
> > >>> </File>
> > >>>
> > >>> The
> > >>> use case for why I want such a filter is to forward a range of events
> > >>> to an appender. The threshold filter won't work because it will send
> > >>> all events matching a certain level and lower to the appender. For
> > >>> instance, I might want all DEBUG, TRACE and VERBOSE events going to one
> > >>> appender. All INFO, ERROR and WARN events going to another appender.
> > >>> All BUSINESS events (my custom) level, going to yet another appender.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Nick
> > >>>
> > >>>> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:17:44 -0700
> > >>>> Subject: Re: range filter?
> > >>>> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > >>>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>> When you get it working, it sounds like it would make a nice addition
> > to
> > >>>> the FAQ with a description of your use case.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Gary
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ralph Goers <
> > ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I believe two threshold filters inside a composite filter should
> > should
> > >>>>> work provided you have the onMatch and onMismatch set appropriately.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Ralph
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm looking for a range filter in log4j2. I see there is on in
> > >>> log4net
> > >>>>> and it appears there was one written by someone for log4j 1. Just
> > >>>>> wondering if there is something 'out of the box' in log4j2 that will
> > >>>>> accomplish the same? I was wondering whether this could be
> > >>> accomplished
> > >>>>> with the CompositeFilter with two ThresholdFilter?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Nick
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > >>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > >>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
