No we are not and since it’s a log.debug() it should just get dropped on the 
floor before any sort of copying occurs, right?

Ron DiFrango

On 2/13/17, 12:50 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Are you logging that info?
    
    On 13 February 2017 at 11:46, DiFrango, Ronald <
    ronald.difra...@capitalone.com> wrote:
    
    > All,
    >
    > One thing we just noticed is that we are using Apache’s HTTP connection
    > pooling for our downstream calls and in our latest performance run is that
    > the READ operation on org.apache.http.impl.conn.LoggingInputStream seems
    > to be taking a bulk of the time.
    >
    > If I look at the code, once the HTTP client reads the byte stream it
    > issues a log.debug which could be a large payload, I wonder if that’s what
    > is causing the issue?
    >
    > Please note aware, the version of httpclient we’ve been using has also
    > been constant:
    >
    > <dependency>
    >         <groupId>org.apache.httpcomponents</groupId>
    >         <artifactId>httpclient</artifactId>
    >         <version>4.5.2</version>
    > </dependency>
    >
    > Ron DiFrango
    >
    >
    > On 2/13/17, 11:44 AM, "DiFrango, Ronald" <ronald.difra...@capitalone.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >     This is running in Tomcat 8.0.33 in a Docker Container via AWS’s ECS
    > which is identical to before with log4j2 2.5.
    >
    >     We’ve run the application with Visual VM and the one thing for sure
    > that we’ve seen is that in 2.6.2 it created tons of threads, something 
like
    > 50+ but on 2.6 or 2.7 it was only 2.  Now the threads were short lived, 
but
    > they got created.
    >
    >     We’re running another performance test today with Async loggers to see
    > if that helps or exhibits the same thing though previous testing with 
Async
    > had some of the same char
    >
    >     Here’s our layout pattern:
    >
    >            [%t] %d{DATE} %-5p %-15c{1} [%X]: %cm%n
    >
    >     Please not the %cm is a custom message handler that we use to use to
    > handle security filtering of the message payload aka we extend from
    > LogEventPatternConverter.
    >
    >     Thanks,
    >
    >     Ron DiFrango
    >
    >     On 2/13/17, 11:22 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >         What server environment are you running this in?
    >
    >         On 13 February 2017 at 09:19, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >         > Ron,
    >         >
    >         > We haven't heard of any issues like you describe.
    >         > Have you tried running your application with Java Flight 
Recorder
    >         > <https://docs.oracle.com/javacomponents/jmc-5-4/jfr-
    >         > runtime-guide/run.htm#JFRUH176>?
    >         > This should help diagnose what is going on.
    >         >
    >         > Remko
    >         >
    >         >
    >         >
    >         > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:59 PM, DiFrango, Ronald <
    >         > ronald.difra...@capitalone.com> wrote:
    >         >
    >         > > All,
    >         > >
    >         > > We recently upgrade to 2.6 and noticed a dramatic increase in
    > CPU and
    >         > > Thread utilization that seems to be tied to the new “garbage
    > free” mode
    >         > of
    >         > > log4j  2.6.  Here’s some of the baseline numbers:
    >         > >
    >         > >
    >         > > ·         Log4j 2.5: CPU typically ran around 25%
    >         > >
    >         > > ·         Log4j 2.6: CPU typically ran around 75%
    >         > >
    >         > > ·         Log4j 2.6.2+: CPU typically ran around 100%
    >         > >
    >         > > ·         We’ve also tried turning off garbage free mode and
    > that made
    >         > > things worse as the CPU was around 120% and caused us to not
    > meet our
    >         > SLA’s
    >         > >
    >         > > It important to note that this is a REST Api using Jersey and
    > typically
    >         > > responds in about in under 50ms on a per request so its high
    > volume, but
    >         > > the logging level is WARN or higher except for our single
    > performance log
    >         > > record which is written once per request using the lambda base
    > approach.
    >         > >
    >         > > Our next test is going to be switching to all ASYNC loggers
    > and see what
    >         > > effect that has, but I guess the general question is, has
    > anyone else
    >         > seen
    >         > > this?  Any thoughts?
    >         > >
    >         > > Ron DiFrango
    >         > > ________________________________________________________
    >         > >
    >         > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential 
and/or
    >         > > proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only
    > be used
    >         > > solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
    >         > information
    >         > > transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the
    > individual or entity
    >         > > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not
    > the
    >         > intended
    >         > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
    > retransmission,
    >         > > dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or
    > taking of any
    >         > > action in reliance upon this information is strictly
    > prohibited. If you
    >         > > have received this communication in error, please contact the
    > sender and
    >         > > delete the material from your computer.
    >         > >
    >         >
    >
    >
    >
    >         --
    >         Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
    >
    >
    >     ________________________________________________________
    >
    >     The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
    > proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
    > solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
    > transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
    > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended
    > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
    > dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
    > action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
    > have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
    > delete the material from your computer.
    >
    >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
    >     For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________________________________
    >
    > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
    > proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
    > solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
    > transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
    > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended
    > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
    > dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
    > action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
    > have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
    > delete the material from your computer.
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
    > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
    >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
    

________________________________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to 
Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of 
work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is 
intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying 
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

Reply via email to