Ronald,

On 2/13/17 2:29 PM, DiFrango, Ronald wrote:
> Yeah, I’m aware and agreed, but this is done in the Apache HTTP Client 
> Component’s Code, not ours and existed as-is with log4j2 in ALL the versions 
> we’ve been using.
> 
> That said, I think this is a red herring and it’s still true that at least 
> for our application any version of log4j2 beyond 2.5 consumes more CPU that 
> 2.5 this is a REST based APi using Tomcat+Jersey+Spring [again nothing has 
> changed] and processing around 50 transactions per second with a guarantee of 
> a minimum of 1 log record to request.
> 
> We just haven’t identified WHERE its causing the issue.
> 
> One additional data point, we are using the bridging JAR’s for the following 
> as not all 3rd party libraries follow any standard on what they use:
> 
>        Classis log4j
>        SLF4J
>        commons-logging


You mentioned that lots of threads were being created and that they were
short-lived. What code is creating those threads? You never said...

-chris

> On 2/13/17, 2:11 PM, "Apache" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
>     The log.debug call will exit quickly, but if it is constructing a large 
> message that will happen anyway unless one of the standard techniques (like 
> wrapping in a logger.isDebugEnabled call) is used to avoid it. Constructing 
> debug Strings can be expensive.
>     
>     Ralph
>     
>     > On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:58 AM, DiFrango, Ronald 
> <ronald.difra...@capitalone.com> wrote:
>     > 
>     > No we are not and since it’s a log.debug() it should just get dropped 
> on the floor before any sort of copying occurs, right?
>     > 
>     > Ron DiFrango
>     > 
>     > On 2/13/17, 12:50 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > 
>     >    Are you logging that info?
>     > 
>     >    On 13 February 2017 at 11:46, DiFrango, Ronald <
>     >    ronald.difra...@capitalone.com> wrote:
>     > 
>     >> All,
>     >> 
>     >> One thing we just noticed is that we are using Apache’s HTTP connection
>     >> pooling for our downstream calls and in our latest performance run is 
> that
>     >> the READ operation on org.apache.http.impl.conn.LoggingInputStream 
> seems
>     >> to be taking a bulk of the time.
>     >> 
>     >> If I look at the code, once the HTTP client reads the byte stream it
>     >> issues a log.debug which could be a large payload, I wonder if that’s 
> what
>     >> is causing the issue?
>     >> 
>     >> Please note aware, the version of httpclient we’ve been using has also
>     >> been constant:
>     >> 
>     >> <dependency>
>     >>        <groupId>org.apache.httpcomponents</groupId>
>     >>        <artifactId>httpclient</artifactId>
>     >>        <version>4.5.2</version>
>     >> </dependency>
>     >> 
>     >> Ron DiFrango
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >> On 2/13/17, 11:44 AM, "DiFrango, Ronald" 
> <ronald.difra...@capitalone.com>
>     >> wrote:
>     >> 
>     >>    This is running in Tomcat 8.0.33 in a Docker Container via AWS’s ECS
>     >> which is identical to before with log4j2 2.5.
>     >> 
>     >>    We’ve run the application with Visual VM and the one thing for sure
>     >> that we’ve seen is that in 2.6.2 it created tons of threads, something 
> like
>     >> 50+ but on 2.6 or 2.7 it was only 2.  Now the threads were short 
> lived, but
>     >> they got created.
>     >> 
>     >>    We’re running another performance test today with Async loggers to 
> see
>     >> if that helps or exhibits the same thing though previous testing with 
> Async
>     >> had some of the same char
>     >> 
>     >>    Here’s our layout pattern:
>     >> 
>     >>           [%t] %d{DATE} %-5p %-15c{1} [%X]: %cm%n
>     >> 
>     >>    Please not the %cm is a custom message handler that we use to use to
>     >> handle security filtering of the message payload aka we extend from
>     >> LogEventPatternConverter.
>     >> 
>     >>    Thanks,
>     >> 
>     >>    Ron DiFrango
>     >> 
>     >>    On 2/13/17, 11:22 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >> 
>     >>        What server environment are you running this in?
>     >> 
>     >>        On 13 February 2017 at 09:19, Remko Popma 
> <remko.po...@gmail.com>
>     >> wrote:
>     >> 
>     >>> Ron,
>     >>> 
>     >>> We haven't heard of any issues like you describe.
>     >>> Have you tried running your application with Java Flight Recorder
>     >>> <https://docs.oracle.com/javacomponents/jmc-5-4/jfr-
>     >>> runtime-guide/run.htm#JFRUH176>?
>     >>> This should help diagnose what is going on.
>     >>> 
>     >>> Remko
>     >>> 
>     >>> 
>     >>> 
>     >>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:59 PM, DiFrango, Ronald <
>     >>> ronald.difra...@capitalone.com> wrote:
>     >>> 
>     >>>> All,
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> We recently upgrade to 2.6 and noticed a dramatic increase in
>     >> CPU and
>     >>>> Thread utilization that seems to be tied to the new “garbage
>     >> free” mode
>     >>> of
>     >>>> log4j  2.6.  Here’s some of the baseline numbers:
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> ·         Log4j 2.5: CPU typically ran around 25%
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> ·         Log4j 2.6: CPU typically ran around 75%
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> ·         Log4j 2.6.2+: CPU typically ran around 100%
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> ·         We’ve also tried turning off garbage free mode and
>     >> that made
>     >>>> things worse as the CPU was around 120% and caused us to not
>     >> meet our
>     >>> SLA’s
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> It important to note that this is a REST Api using Jersey and
>     >> typically
>     >>>> responds in about in under 50ms on a per request so its high
>     >> volume, but
>     >>>> the logging level is WARN or higher except for our single
>     >> performance log
>     >>>> record which is written once per request using the lambda base
>     >> approach.
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> Our next test is going to be switching to all ASYNC loggers
>     >> and see what
>     >>>> effect that has, but I guess the general question is, has
>     >> anyone else
>     >>> seen
>     >>>> this?  Any thoughts?
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> Ron DiFrango
>     >>>> ________________________________________________________
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>     >>>> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only
>     >> be used
>     >>>> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
>     >>> information
>     >>>> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the
>     >> individual or entity
>     >>>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not
>     >> the
>     >>> intended
>     >>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>     >> retransmission,
>     >>>> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or
>     >> taking of any
>     >>>> action in reliance upon this information is strictly
>     >> prohibited. If you
>     >>>> have received this communication in error, please contact the
>     >> sender and
>     >>>> delete the material from your computer.
>     >>>> 
>     >>> 
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >>        --
>     >>        Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >>    ________________________________________________________
>     >> 
>     >>    The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>     >> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
>     >> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The 
> information
>     >> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or 
> entity
>     >> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the 
> intended
>     >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
>     >> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
>     >> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
>     >> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender 
> and
>     >> delete the material from your computer.
>     >> 
>     >>    
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >>    To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>     >>    For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >> ________________________________________________________
>     >> 
>     >> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>     >> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
>     >> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The 
> information
>     >> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or 
> entity
>     >> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the 
> intended
>     >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
>     >> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
>     >> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
>     >> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender 
> and
>     >> delete the material from your computer.
>     >> 
>     >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>     >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     > 
>     > 
>     >    -- 
>     >    Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>     > 
>     > 
>     > ________________________________________________________
>     > 
>     > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or 
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely 
> in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information 
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to 
> which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, 
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action 
> in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete 
> the material from your computer.
>     > 
>     > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>     > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>     > 
>     
>     
>     
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>     For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>     
>     
> 
> ________________________________________________________
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary 
> to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in 
> performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted 
> herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is 
> addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, 
> distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance 
> upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
> from your computer.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to