also sprach Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.16.1147 +0200]: > Should the rules be included in the sympa package, to be adapted to > updates of the program, or be kept in logcheck-database (for cases of > manual installations of sympa ?).
I think it makes more sense to have it distributed by sympa. > If the file were to be moved, would there be a need for > a diversion to adapt to the transitional period where it would > have been added in sympa and not yet removed from > logcheck-database, maybe ? You take the file and upload a new version, which Replaces logcheck and let us know. We can then upload a new version without the file. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "i am not in favour of long engagements. they give people the opportunity of finding out each other's character before marriage, which i think is never advisable." -- oscar wilde
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
