Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 11:01 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit : > also sprach Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.17.1043 +0200]: > > And what about the diversion option, which can help accomodate both uses > > of logcheck ? > > Since the files are in /etc and dpkg conffiles, diversions can't be > used. Arguably, that's a bug in dpkg, but it's been the case for > years: do not divert conffiles.
I'm not sure I get the rationale here... I'm not so familiar with the diversions. Could you point me to reference docs ? Anyway, this seems too bad... Maybe the logcheck rules shoudln't be dpkg conffiles ? Sorry in advance if this is a bit naïve. I assumed my question was kinda FAQ about logcheck but I'm not so sure now... May I suggest to document some guidelines for Debian packagers explaining some policy regarding such cases (i.e. where should the rules be ;). Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*NEW ADDRESS*) http://www-inf.it-sudparis.eu/~olberger/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM / TELECOM & Management SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry _______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
