also sprach Ronny Adsetts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.17.1010 +0200]:
> Personally I'd prefer it to be distributed with logcheck. When you
> have a centralised log server running logcheck, it's rather
> painful trying to get rules set up when packages ship their own
> logcheck rules.

This is not what logcheck was designed for.

Anyway, I don't want to come across as dictating what can and cannot
be done.

Ronny, if you are using logcheck extensively, maybe you could help
out a bit with the packaging?

The basic rule remains: those who do get to decide how to do it. :)

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
it's as bad as you think, and they are out to get you.
 
spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

_______________________________________________
Logcheck-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel

Reply via email to