---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Erika Nomen
2020 SILFS Prize for Women in Logic and the Philosophy of Science Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze The Evaluation Committee for the 2020 SILFS Prize for Women in Logic and the Philosophy of Science was composed of: Cristina Amoretti (Università di Genova) Margherita Benzi (Università del Piemonte Orientale) Raffaella Campaner (Università di Bologna) Elena Casetta (Università di Torino) Agata Ciabattoni (Technische Universität Wien) Giovanna Corsi (Università di Bologna) Luisa Damiano (Università di Messina) Laura Felline (Independent researcher) Eleonora Montuschi (Università di Venezia, Cà Foscari) Sara Negri (Università di Genova) Federica Russo (University of Amsterdam) Viola Schiaffonati (Politecnico di Milano) To evaluate the 25 proposals received, the following procedure was adopted: 1. Paper bidding. All members of the Evaluation Committee read all the 25 abstracts indicating a minimum of 3 preferences for the review. To begin with, each paper had a single reviewer. 2. Review. Each paper was reviewed on the basis of the following criteria, with a score from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent): 1. Constructive character of the proposed thesis; 2. Originality of the proposed thesis, understood as the ability to open new spaces for discussion within existing debates or create new fields of philosophical interest; 3. Argumentation accuracy; 4. Breadth of the literature considered, also with regard to scientific production that goes beyond Anglo-American literature. The 5 papers that obtained the highest score have passed to the second round of reviewing. 3. Collective discussion. The 5 finalists were evaluated by all the members of the Evaluation Committee according to the above criteria, also taking into account the different degree of confidence of the various members. At the end of the evaluation process, two papers were equally worthy: Anne Sophie Meincke, A Process View of Pregnancy Since Aristotle, substances have enjoyed a sort of ontological primacy, and this has shaped our language and thought. Anne Sophie Meincke asks us to look at the world around us in terms of processes rather than entities, and thus at a pregnant individual as a process – a “bifurcating hypercomplex process”. This innovative perspective appears able to open promising research directions and generate fruitful debates, not only in the domain of the metaphysics of pregnancy, but also in the fields of philosophy of biology, ethics and bioethics. Anela Lolic, Towards the Analysis of Mathematical Proofs: Cut-Elimination and Herbrand's Theorem in Presence of Induction The work proposed by Anela Lolic belongs to an emerging research line, dedicated to the analysis of mathematical proofs based on the methods of structural theory of proof. The work is characterized by originality, a remarkable formal sophistication and an expert fusion of established methods of mathematical logic and recent methodologies. After careful discussion, the Evaluation Committee decided to award the ex-aequo prize to the two authors above, who are therefore both winners in all respects. Part of the award would be to participate as keynote speaker at the Triennial International Conference of the Italian Society for Logic and Philosophy of Science with the reimbursement of travel and accommodation expenses (up to a maximum of 1500 euros). -- Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos Grupos do Google. Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um e-mail para [email protected]. Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAO6j_LhPpwpQp2N_Q%3D-b_sAG%3D%2BxCskp_sUpOsRi92a1kDUHtKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
