Muito obrigada Joao Marcos!
nao tinha visto mesmo esse premio! muito legal!
abs
Valeria

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:03 PM Joao Marcos <[email protected]> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Erika Nomen
>
>
> 2020 SILFS Prize for Women in Logic and the Philosophy of Science
>
> Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze
>
>
> The Evaluation Committee for the 2020 SILFS Prize for Women in Logic
> and the Philosophy of
>
> Science was composed of:
>
>
> Cristina Amoretti (Università di Genova)
>
> Margherita Benzi (Università del Piemonte Orientale)
>
> Raffaella Campaner (Università di Bologna)
>
> Elena Casetta (Università di Torino)
>
> Agata Ciabattoni (Technische Universität Wien)
>
> Giovanna Corsi (Università di Bologna)
>
> Luisa Damiano (Università di Messina)
>
> Laura Felline (Independent researcher)
>
> Eleonora Montuschi (Università di Venezia, Cà Foscari)
>
> Sara Negri (Università di Genova)
>
> Federica Russo (University of Amsterdam)
>
> Viola Schiaffonati (Politecnico di Milano)
>
>
> To evaluate the 25 proposals received, the following procedure was adopted:
>
>
> 1. Paper bidding. All members of the Evaluation Committee read all the
> 25 abstracts indicating a
>
> minimum of 3 preferences for the review. To begin with, each paper had
> a single reviewer.
>
>
> 2. Review. Each paper was reviewed on the basis of the following
> criteria, with a score from 1
>
> (poor) to 5 (excellent):
>
>
> 1. Constructive character of the proposed thesis;
>
> 2. Originality of the proposed thesis, understood as the ability to
> open new spaces for
>
> discussion within existing debates or create new fields of
> philosophical interest;
>
> 3. Argumentation accuracy;
>
> 4. Breadth of the literature considered, also with regard to
> scientific production that goes
>
> beyond Anglo-American literature.
>
>
> The 5 papers that obtained the highest score have passed to the second
> round of reviewing.
>
>
> 3. Collective discussion. The 5 finalists were evaluated by all the
> members of the Evaluation
>
> Committee according to the above criteria, also taking into account
> the different degree of
>
> confidence of the various members.
>
>
> At the end of the evaluation process, two papers were equally worthy:
>
>
> Anne Sophie Meincke, A Process View of Pregnancy
>
>
> Since Aristotle, substances have enjoyed a sort of ontological
> primacy, and this has shaped
>
> our language and thought. Anne Sophie Meincke asks us to look at the
> world around us in
>
> terms of processes rather than entities, and thus at a pregnant
> individual as a process – a
>
> “bifurcating hypercomplex process”. This innovative perspective
> appears able to open
>
> promising research directions and generate fruitful debates, not only
> in the domain of the
>
> metaphysics of pregnancy, but also in the fields of philosophy of
> biology, ethics and
>
> bioethics.
>
>
> Anela Lolic, Towards the Analysis of Mathematical Proofs:
> Cut-Elimination and Herbrand's
>
> Theorem in Presence of Induction
>
>
> The work proposed by Anela Lolic belongs to an emerging research line,
> dedicated to the
>
> analysis of mathematical proofs based on the methods of structural
> theory of proof. The
>
> work is characterized by originality, a remarkable formal
> sophistication and an expert fusion
>
> of established methods of mathematical logic and recent methodologies.
>
>
> After careful discussion, the Evaluation Committee decided to award
> the ex-aequo prize to the
>
> two authors above, who are therefore both winners in all respects.
>
>
> Part of the award would be to participate as keynote speaker at the
> Triennial International
>
> Conference of the Italian Society for Logic and Philosophy of Science
> with the reimbursement of
>
> travel and accommodation expenses (up to a maximum of 1500 euros).
>
> --
> Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L"
> dos Grupos do Google.
> Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie
> um e-mail para [email protected].
> Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse
> https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAO6j_LhPpwpQp2N_Q%3D-b_sAG%3D%2BxCskp_sUpOsRi92a1kDUHtKQ%40mail.gmail.com
> .
>


-- 
Valeria de Paiva
http://vcvpaiva.github.io/
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~vdp/

-- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para [email protected].
Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAESt%3DXs8s_%3DSyqs%3D8rS4_5FR%2Br0D-aASDDxEUO5ECiYJHKFpqA%40mail.gmail.com.

Responder a