Car@s,
Muito apreciei um dos critérios, o qual, por coincidência ou não, retrata um dos pontos pelos quais tenho me batido há anos: "Breadth of the literature considered, also with regard to scientific production that goes beyond Anglo-American literature.". O paradigma anglo-americano, perdoem-me os que dele vivem,, não é o único parâmetro do universo acadêmico . Abraços, Walter Em sex, 2 de out de 2020 16:03, Joao Marcos <[email protected]> escreveu: > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Erika Nomen > > > 2020 SILFS Prize for Women in Logic and the Philosophy of Science > > Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze > > > The Evaluation Committee for the 2020 SILFS Prize for Women in Logic > and the Philosophy of > > Science was composed of: > > > Cristina Amoretti (Università di Genova) > > Margherita Benzi (Università del Piemonte Orientale) > > Raffaella Campaner (Università di Bologna) > > Elena Casetta (Università di Torino) > > Agata Ciabattoni (Technische Universität Wien) > > Giovanna Corsi (Università di Bologna) > > Luisa Damiano (Università di Messina) > > Laura Felline (Independent researcher) > > Eleonora Montuschi (Università di Venezia, Cà Foscari) > > Sara Negri (Università di Genova) > > Federica Russo (University of Amsterdam) > > Viola Schiaffonati (Politecnico di Milano) > > > To evaluate the 25 proposals received, the following procedure was adopted: > > > 1. Paper bidding. All members of the Evaluation Committee read all the > 25 abstracts indicating a > > minimum of 3 preferences for the review. To begin with, each paper had > a single reviewer. > > > 2. Review. Each paper was reviewed on the basis of the following > criteria, with a score from 1 > > (poor) to 5 (excellent): > > > 1. Constructive character of the proposed thesis; > > 2. Originality of the proposed thesis, understood as the ability to > open new spaces for > > discussion within existing debates or create new fields of > philosophical interest; > > 3. Argumentation accuracy; > > 4. Breadth of the literature considered, also with regard to > scientific production that goes > > beyond Anglo-American literature. > > > The 5 papers that obtained the highest score have passed to the second > round of reviewing. > > > 3. Collective discussion. The 5 finalists were evaluated by all the > members of the Evaluation > > Committee according to the above criteria, also taking into account > the different degree of > > confidence of the various members. > > > At the end of the evaluation process, two papers were equally worthy: > > > Anne Sophie Meincke, A Process View of Pregnancy > > > Since Aristotle, substances have enjoyed a sort of ontological > primacy, and this has shaped > > our language and thought. Anne Sophie Meincke asks us to look at the > world around us in > > terms of processes rather than entities, and thus at a pregnant > individual as a process – a > > “bifurcating hypercomplex process”. This innovative perspective > appears able to open > > promising research directions and generate fruitful debates, not only > in the domain of the > > metaphysics of pregnancy, but also in the fields of philosophy of > biology, ethics and > > bioethics. > > > Anela Lolic, Towards the Analysis of Mathematical Proofs: > Cut-Elimination and Herbrand's > > Theorem in Presence of Induction > > > The work proposed by Anela Lolic belongs to an emerging research line, > dedicated to the > > analysis of mathematical proofs based on the methods of structural > theory of proof. The > > work is characterized by originality, a remarkable formal > sophistication and an expert fusion > > of established methods of mathematical logic and recent methodologies. > > > After careful discussion, the Evaluation Committee decided to award > the ex-aequo prize to the > > two authors above, who are therefore both winners in all respects. > > > Part of the award would be to participate as keynote speaker at the > Triennial International > > Conference of the Italian Society for Logic and Philosophy of Science > with the reimbursement of > > travel and accommodation expenses (up to a maximum of 1500 euros). > > -- > Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" > dos Grupos do Google. > Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie > um e-mail para [email protected]. > Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse > https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAO6j_LhPpwpQp2N_Q%3D-b_sAG%3D%2BxCskp_sUpOsRi92a1kDUHtKQ%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos Grupos do Google. Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um e-mail para [email protected]. Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAOrCsLdZ8usppf-4XZXBpOyte4J8znA5wO-a%2BVArALGD6gbbrg%40mail.gmail.com.
