In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robin Szemeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this works fine if the function returns a list with more than one thing
> in it .. if there is only one thing in the array I get a 'dont know how
> to access [ 3 ].0 if for example item 3 is returned.
> if I access the result as just plain [% item %] it works fine if there is
> one item in the list .. and returns lots of ARRAY0x1241234 if there is
> more than one ...
Sounds like your dereferencing function may be returning a SCALAR instead
of an ARRAY when there's only one result?
rob partington % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://lynx.browser.org/