At 11:43 20/03/2001 -0500, Dave Cross wrote: >Which is the ISO standard (number 8601) for dates for a very good >reason. I thought I'd look this up, but the BSI want 50 quid for a copy. I appreciate this is how they make money to fund the standards work but it seems a tad steep for the casual viewer such as myself. Anyone know of a free online resource ? Simon Cheepskate
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David H. Adler
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Marty Pauley
- Balding Badly-Coiffed Hackers (... Jonathan Stowe
- Balding Badly-Coiffed Hackers (... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Balding Badly-Coiffed H... David H. Adler
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wilcox
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Alex Page
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. AEF
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... Simon Wilcox
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... AEF
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... David Cantrell
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Chris Devers
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Batistoni
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Mison
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Robinson
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Ian Brayshaw
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell