|
Since Gregg can’t seem to post to the list (inept) I
will do it for him. Come on Gregg, what’s the deal? paul -----Original Message----- We have no need to invent it. We can begin by
condensing the Nat'l Platform, eliminating solely-int'l questions. I
believe that will be enough for the March issue. Then we can turn our
attention to studying individual CO issues more intensely, learning
specifically of CO Const. articles & sections, laws & bureaus to
recommend for elimination or change. This is a grand program which will
continue for years, handed down to new un-burned-out members of the future, who
will undoubtedly have found new ones in the meantime to
nix. Gregg
Okay – me three. I just sent a
message to Steve complaining that I could not find the state platform published
on the LPCO website or anywhere else (Tom Parker’s LPBC site is always good as
well as Ari’s). Now I come to understand that the reason
that it is not published is because it does not exist. This, in my view makes the task less
onerous, as we are not contradicting or challenging present members of our own
state group. We are inventing it. paul -----Original
Message----- Gregg, Under CO Libs, the
National Platform is 29 pages & there's no State Platform. Am I
missing something? If not, our duty is to separate out state? Where
do I find a State Platform? Gregg
|
- Re: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee SFGresh
- Re: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee Gregg Miller
- Re: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee John A. Lappart
- Re: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee Dana ACLP
- RE: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee Paul Tiger
- RE: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee Paul Tiger
- RE: Fw: CO Lib Platform Committee Paul Tiger
- Paul Tiger
