I debated whether to respond or not one last time. Oh well, I lied ... Luiz Carlos Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bottom line is that in my opinion, unfortunately, LPI is > getting closer to the proprietary solutions to the certification > and education industry.
Huh? The exam development is _open_ to _all_ that wish to donate their time and efforts. The exam development is _not_ driven by vendors. And there is still *0* money acquired from training or materials by LPI. _Please_ show me another organization that does this. CompTIA is about the only one in the IT industry, and they are _very_far_ from LPI in both depth and openness. Sorry, but I have to label this "rhetoric" with absolutely no foundation. Please educate me on what you see as "proprietary" or otherwise "closer" to other organizations in the industry. > A proof is the scarse postings to this list, if compared > to two or three years before. Huh? This list has its periods of activity as well as inactivity, and that has continued through this year as well. I haven't seen any change, just times of lower as well as increased volume. In fact, many of the bouts of former activity is when I made the fatal errors of posting my thoughts on what consists of enterprise Linux. Then the hordes of people would post how I was off-my-rocker and "nobody uses that." ;-> Oh well, I've been doing so much embedded Linux as of late, I'm sure I've slipped in my enterprise Linux knowledge over the last 15 months or so. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
