S³awomir Kawa³a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I see your point of view. I understand that Samba is widely > used in many corporations, but is LPIC3 dedicated for people who > works for them? It is good idea to make some specializations and > I think that for example people who are responsible for (err i > can't find suitable word) 'keeping network in good conditions' > (where linux is often used as system running on routers) don't > have to know Samba and they still should have opportunity to get > LPIC3.
Broken record ... skip ... skip ... skip ... ;-> Then it's obvious you've *NEVER* been to a LPI Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting. Because if you have, you'd already be "best friends" with Matt on this! ;-> But since you haven't, here's a _very_detailed_ account of the 2006 April Boston TAC (the last 1/3rd of the entry covers the "last day" and the TAC): http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2006/04/business-of-linuxworld.html Again, if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! You just might find the people who are heading up LPIC-3 will not only listen you, but they actually *AGREE* and are *ALREADY* moving down this path. ;-> Again, please, please, *READ* my blog entries! ;-> http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2006/04/business-of-linuxworld.html http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2006/12/lpi-reiterates-and-updates.html -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
