Etienne Goyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which nicely sum up why I object Samba being a core exam.
And despite your ass-u-me-ptions, its why *I*ALSO*OBJECTED* to Samba as a "core exam" too. ;-> If you'd stop and read what I _actually_ say, instead of ass-u-me-ing what I said, you might actually recognize that I'm not so ... how did you put it below ... > If the data already exist, then great, please kindly point toward > it so we can stop spouting presumption and start discussing facts ! ... "stop spouting presumptions" is it? Most people don't actually disagree with me. But I "think too far outside the box" of "conventional product thought" that they think they do. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
