Just to back up your comment... I know those (extremely experienced) sysadms who will *always* use it in preference to nfs.
Me, I'm easy. Steve On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:54:54 -0500 Etienne Goyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sławomir Kawała wrote: > > I would like to take LPIC3 soon, and I will learn Samba if it will be > > necessary, but I think that it would be waste of my time, because I am > > not and I will not be a Samba user. > > Which nicely sum up why I object Samba being a core exam. I believe > that a lot of senior Linux system administrator, especially in > enterprise setting, are not dealing with Samba *at all*. But do not > take my, or somebody else, word for it. This need to be measured. If > the data already exist, then great, please kindly point toward it so we > can stop spouting presumption and start discussing facts ! > > > -- > Etienne Goyer 0x3106BCC2 > > "For Bruce Schneier, SHA-1 is merely a compression algorithm." > http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/164 > > _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
