"Bryan J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is where Matthew's idea of having work experience, etc.,
> > count towards recertification comes into play. Who cares
> > whether you have read> the textbook if you have *written* it! :^)
>
> And who is going to *PAY* for this? Really?!?!?!
>
> Lab-based certs and peer-reviewed resumes and countless other
> "processes" _cost_money_. So, again, how do you expect LPI to *PAY*
> for all these "wants"?
>
> To "pay" for all of what your "wants," LPI would either have to
> massively jack up the exam prices -- or *WORSE* yet -- give into the
> "training profit model." You want to see LPI _destroy_ its
> objectivity overnight? Have them go that latter route. ;->
"I have a cunning plan."
-- Baldrick
Well, more of a copycat approach, actually.
To bring up the PMI and (ISC)2 orgs again...
Take a look at the (ISC)2's certification policy:
https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?page=813#reqs
one of the requirements is:
- Successfully clear the audit of his/her experience assertions, if
his/her file is selected for audit,
So we audit a certain amount of the recerts. Say we audit 25% of recerts and
charge $250 for a recert (PMI charges $150, (ISC)2 doesn't appear to charge
anything but there is an $85/year 'maintenance fee'). This give LPI a budget
of $1,000 to perform each audit. By using the local affiliate and local
alumni where we can, I think that LPI could handle this task.
Doable?
Regards,
--
g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
