Scott Lamberton wrote:

> PLEASE DO NOT DISCUSS EXAM CONTENT DETAILS ON THIS LIST!
>
> Infractions of this policy will have you, at the very least, barred from
> posting to this list.

Which would be particularly silly/deplorable in this specific case as many of 
the issues Mr Steudten is complaining about will become moot next Wednesday, 
anyway. If he'd just delayed his exam for a single *week* he would presumably 
have seen quite a different picture, and there isn't much sense in engaging 
in a round of LPI bashing just now.

Anyway, »exam content details«? Sheesh. I don't think there is anything in Mr 
Steudten's post that isn't also part of the published objectives. It's not as 
if he had posted a brain-dump of his exam or anything. If we're not allowed 
to mention even the content of the *published* objectives on this list, what 
do you propose to do about the lpi-examdev list, which is specifically 
*meant* for discussing (future) exam content, and where of course published 
and possible future exam objectives come up all the time? Will you want that 
list to be moderated, too?

Anselm

PS. His second message suggests that there is also a slight problem as far as
    communicating the fact that the exam objectives will change on 1 April
    is concerned. This is arguably the #1 top important issue of note to
    95% of LPI's clientele these days, so there would certainly seem to be
    some justification for posting a huge and obvious banner to that effect on
    the LPI home page, rather than camouflaging the announcement among a
    bunch of other, comparatively insignificant, press releases advertised in
    3-pt type in the middle of the page. You presume a level of attentiveness
    and reading comprehension of corporatese English on the part of LPIC-1/2
    candidates that may or may not actually be there, where I'd much rather
    see something to the effect of

      HEY FOLKS, THE CONTENT OF THE LPIC-1/2 EXAMS WILL CHANGE ON APRIL 1ST!!!

    in large, friendly letters across the top of the page, on the off-chance.
    With the current arrangement, it's a good thing you didn't manage to
    announce two more seminars or master affiliates or else the new-objectives
    announcement might have scrolled off the home page completely. Just trying
    to be helpful ...

(This is my personal opinion and not that of Linup Front GmbH.)
-- 
Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen
Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany
[email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to