|
I just want to query something. Maybe unrelated to the whole topic here
but.. "Indeed knowledge of a more correct/complete version of the exam objectives would not be a fair advantage" If you phrase this slightly different to: "knowledge of the correct/complete exam objectives would not be a fair advantage" How are you expected to pass any exam without knowing the objectives? How can we be sure that the official objectives are even some degree complete or close to the actual objectives? This idea of the objectives or topics of the exam being a secret seem counter-productive. Does anyone else see where a statement likes this (knowledge of the objectives is an unfair advantage) leads? Comments? -Chris [email protected] wrote: Send lpi-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected]To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of lpi-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Printing Exam Objectives - print.css (Jeremy Hooks) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:33:36 +0100 From: Jeremy Hooks <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] Printing Exam Objectives - print.css To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
_______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
