I think that objectives should be clear and the reqested knowledge clearly limited. How else can you prepare.
You should know what you have to study by knowing what the questions can be asked about. Regards, Pieter van Emmerik Chris Cralle schreef: > I just want to query something. Maybe unrelated to the whole topic > here but.. > > "Indeed knowledge of a more correct/complete version of the exam > objectives would not be a fair advantage" > > If you phrase this slightly different to: > "knowledge of the correct/complete exam objectives would not be a fair > advantage" > > How are you expected to pass any exam without knowing the objectives? > How can we be sure that the official objectives are even some degree > complete or close to the actual objectives? > This idea of the objectives or topics of the exam being a secret seem > counter-productive. > > Does anyone else see where a statement likes this (knowledge of the > objectives is an unfair advantage) leads? > > Comments? > > -Chris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
