> "Indeed knowledge of a more correct/complete version of the exam objectives > would not be a fair advantage"
All the objectives contain a 'partial list of list' of the files, terms and utilities. As I candidate I would prefer it if this list were complete. For whatever reason they use the term 'partial list', perhaps it is because they want to cover them- selves incase they missed something from the list or perhaps they want the freedom to add stuff later - I don't know (I'm just a candidate). I did spotted on the wiki has items in it's partial lists which aren't on the main website e.g. for 204.2 in the wiki mentions hdparm and sdparm - whereas the main website only mentions hdparm. Knowing that in itself isn't an unfair advantage IMHO. However if I knew that the version in the wiki was more correct then I would have a (very tiny) advantage over those who were using the objectives on the main website. > If you phrase this slightly different to: > "knowledge of the correct/complete exam objectives would not be a fair > advantage" You can rephrase what I wrote if if you like, but then it won't be what I wrote. It may only be slightly rephrased, but the meaning is changed entirely. _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
