Op 22 nov. 2013 17:17 schreef "Alessandro Selli" <[email protected]>
het volgende:
>
> On 21/11/2013 00:06, Anselm Lingnau wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Precision in legal documents is an asset.
>
>   Indeed it is.
>
>   I do trust the LPI people, but I do not know anybody from Pearson,
> which is an organization that is not built on the same ethical (or
> philosophical, if you prefer) grounds as LPI, and I cannot extend the
> trust I put into LPI to third parties automatically.

I tend to agree that the clarity in the document might be good. It is a bit
ambiguous now.

That said, it does raise the question why one would trust LPI and not
Pearson.  Personally i know nobody from either organization.
Although that didn't stop me from getting my lpic-1 certification, and
having lpic-2 on the roadmap. ;-)

mvg, Guus
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to