On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:53:44AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Jason Richey wrote:
>
> > > [2.3.8, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.5, 2.4.7, 2.4.8, 2.4.10, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.5.7,
>2.5.8, 2.5.9, 2.5.10 ]
> > > Obj 4 : Customizing Kernel
> > > Patch, recompile, and reconfigure kernel options to customize kernel
> > > for system requirements. Determine need for kernel compile versus
> > > kernel patch. Build and configure kernel modules.
> > > Includes tools and files such as:
> >
> > You mention "kernel compile versus kernel patch", I think you mean "kernel compile
>versus module compile"
> >
> No, actually I didn't. The task was to determine when you simply need a
> kernel patch instead of a whole kernel compile. Can you suggest better
> verbage to make this clear?
Perhaps "Patching a kernel versus obtaining a new kernel source tree"?
Either way, you're probably recompiling (unless some Linux vendor decides
to get into the binary patch game, and let's hope that doesn't happen :)
-Jon
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
