I would opt for the later, though i am a HUGE majordomo fan and use it
all the time, as well as majorcool. If licensing is an issue with the
current release, then we can wait for v2 to expand on it, but use
mailman as an alternative. Remember, we are required knowledge of how
things work and how to make them work within a linux environment, not
necessarily specific software packages (not withstanding things like
apache, bind, samba, etc)
HTH
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Well guys, while rewriting the objectives today into full sentence and
> HTML form (for publishing) it dawned on me our problem with the mailing
> list objectives. Majordomo 1 is not GPL'ed and Majordomo2 is still in
> alpha.
>
> Managing mailing lists was passed by our JAS, however it was passed based
> on tasks with Majordomo.
>
> So, do we a) stricken the objective and put it on hold until majordomo2 is
> released, or b) cover an alternative such as mailman, which while new does
> meet our licensing criteria?
>
> --
> Kara Pritchard Phone: 618-398-7360
> Author, RHCE Exam Cram
> Director of Exam Development http://www.lpi.org/
> Site Manager http://www.LinuxUsersGroups.org/
> --
>
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to leave the list.
--
Michael B. Weiner, Linux+, Linux+ SME
Systems Administrator/Partner
The UserFriendly Network (UFN)
--
Linux Registered User #94900 Have you been counted?
http://counter.li.org
PGP: 30 1D CC BA 30 30 63 35 CD 58 E0 89 A9 17 CC C0 8C 55 F7 72
......... Escape the 'Gates' of Hell
`:::' ....... ......
::: * `::. ::'
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :'
::: :: :: :: :: :: :::.
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::.
...:::.....................::' .::::..
--
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
