From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well guys, while rewriting the objectives today into full sentence and
> HTML form (for publishing) it dawned on me our problem with the mailing
> list objectives. Majordomo 1 is not GPL'ed and Majordomo2 is still in
> alpha.
There's also Listar and probably a lot more. My perspective is that we try
to cover the topic without relying on a specific package. For example,
possibly valid items could be written about aspects that are in common
across common packages. Or perhaps we could identify two or three package
that hold most of the "market" and ask questions about all three? (And be
explicit about this in the objectives).
Or possibly some of the questions could explicitly require knowledge of the
differences between various packages ("You need features X, Y, and Z. Which
of these would you implement?").
I prefer being generic (but only if valid items can be written generically)
because it makes the items less vulnerable to becoming dated.
-Alan
>
> Managing mailing lists was passed by our JAS, however it was passed based
> on tasks with Majordomo.
>
> So, do we a) stricken the objective and put it on hold until majordomo2 is
> released, or b) cover an alternative such as mailman, which while new does
> meet our licensing criteria?
>
> --
> Kara Pritchard Phone: 618-398-7360
> Author, RHCE Exam Cram
> Director of Exam Development http://www.lpi.org/
> Site Manager http://www.LinuxUsersGroups.org/
> --
>
>
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to leave the list.
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
