I have to gree with both sides of the argument
Just about all the server I look after run some version of the 2.2
kernel, but the main file store will have to move to a 2.4 in the very
near future. The 2GB file size limit is becoming a big problem for me
and 2.4 does fix that. Also, my understanding is that 2.6 will (should)
be fairly close in structure to the 2.4 series. Lastly, all future
enhancements will be either 2.4 or later, so a reasonable understanding
will be needed.
Tom
> I agree. Many of the linux users are still using 2.2 kernel.
> Matt Balaun wrote:
>
>> > Although limited knowledge exists, this is the preferred method
>> for
>> > managing devices in the 2.4 release of Linux. It should be
>> covered
>> > wherever it is decided to cover mknod. I actually teach this in
>> my
>>
>> Why, when there is already talk and plans for scrapping it for a new
>>
>> system in 2.6? Since 2.2 is still the preferred production-level
>> kernel,
>> I think that most, if not all, classes and questions should revolve
>> around
>> 2.2, with perhaps some mention of how things are changed in 2.4
>>
>> --
>
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
