Sorry, once again with my sender-address
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2003 23:07 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2003 21:03 schrieb Evan Leibovitch:
> [...]
>
> > Regarding Level 3: we are still committed to doing this, but the timing
> > and structure of the Level 3 program are still under discussion.
> >
> > Part of the reason why L3 development has been slow has been the time
> > needed to build up a significant (enough) base of people ready to take
> > it. If L3 will require L2 as a prerequisite,
>
> then I think, it´s about time to think this over.
>
> For me there is no reason to have a serial set of certifications instead of
> a series of them. You can´t "learn" Linux in a linear way from the
> beginning to an end. There is only a bit of beginning and there is no end.
> A lot of Linux-users would be able to certify for level 2 but won´t afford
> themselves to take another three x-$ certifications before.
> Let people decide themselves which exam they want to take.
>
> If you take in account the OSAC, you also probably will have people,
> certified for Linux but not certified for which you call the lowest level
> today.
>
> So in future you´ll have to decide for a set of topics, for which people
> want to be certified. In that case you could open every level today
> for every one.
>
> > there need to be a sufficient
> > number of L2 certificate holders. So far, with less than 1,000 LPIC2
> > holders, there isn't enough of a base to (yet) justify producing Level 3.
>
> [...]
>
> > Evan Leibovitch
> > President, LPI
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martien Lammers
--
INNOVATE Ing. Büro Martien Lammers
Staudhamer-Str. 51
85570 Markt Schwaben
Tel. 08121 41643 -- Fax 08121 91050 -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
######################################################
INNOVATE Testcenter: http://testcenter.innovate.de
######################################################
_______________________________________________
Lpi-examdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
