On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:58 -0300, Felipe Salum wrote: > Yes, like I said in the first email, just to "start the thread". Now > the list is heat let's go to the development of LPIC-3 :) > We discuss this again in the future. > Bryan, > I read your old post for LPIC-3 Security using SSCP CBK Domains, really nice.
It's a bit dated and needs to be updated. But the 7 domains of the System Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP) "concepts" match well into 7 types of "tasks" one would practically do on a Linux system connected to a network. > I have taken Security+ from CompTIA (5 Domains), the objetives are > very similar, if you want to talk about the L3 Security later, send me > a message. I took the CompTIA Security+ the same month it came out (back in late 2002). Unfortunately, it was fully of incorrect questions/answers (I still passed handily, but I was really erked by some of the crypto errors). I met up with one of the Security+ SMEs at State Farm a year later and he admitted that the quality didn't surprise him. He said a few of the other SMEs didn't seem to have their facts all correct. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------- The existence of Linux has far more to do with the breakup of AT&T's monopoly than anything Microsoft has ever done. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
