On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 16:54 -0300, Felipe Salum wrote: > Hi Bryan. > I understand your ideas and I think them as good point.
Okay, I can appreciate that. > But in the other side I think LPI wants to make a LPIC-3 exam based in > the "software" solution: > - Samba > - LDAP > - Apache > - NFS > - etc > Test candidates abilities in the related software above. Of which there are major overlap, redundancy and other issues I have extensively pointed out. How many times will the exact same authentication, directory and naming concepts be redundantly covered in the Samba, NFS, LDAP and Apache exams? What about using services from one capability in another, just for authentication, directory or naming? > It is what I understood about all the emails. And I think the focus is going to be a mess. > This is a discussion like "hands on vs. paper based exam"? :) Umm, no, but nice try. We're talking objectives and exam focus, not format. LPI can't develop a hands-on exam in the next year. But LPI could choose the objective and exam focus as I suggested. We're just starting to write objectives now. And for a computer-based format. Not a difference in how the testing happens, just the objective focus. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------- The existence of Linux has far more to do with the breakup of AT&T's monopoly than anything Microsoft has ever done. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
