Hi Bryan,
To step back, in my opinion (remember, _opinion_), I see 3 "separate"
exams to start:
- Authentication, Directory, Naming
- Network File (and Print) Services
- [Network and ]Systems Security (possibly after the first 2)
I don't know if this would be the optimum set of exams. An Samba admin
would care a lot about winbind and dyndns, while a linux-only admin
would not care at all for those. But a prerequisite exam about nss and
pam and other stuff would be nice. But i'd put ldap,nis and nfs separate
from Samba, so candidates could choose a samba-track or a linux-only
track (or maybe both).
About security, I don't see it as a standalone exam. I see lots of
security knoledge that are pre-requisite to samba and nfs/ldap/etc, and
other that are very specific to each track. Of course there's also
advanced security knowledge that would justify a third exam but does not
have prerequisites on samba or nfs/nis/ldap at all.
[]s, Fernando Lozano
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
