On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 00:09 -0400, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Again, if we merely build an exam like Samba that is for a departmental > server and doesn't give the faintest clue of integrating into an > enterprise network, then it's going to be a joke.
Let me augment this statement, because it's _key_ ... If we say, "oh, yeah, if you want Samba to work in an enterprise, then just use Microsoft ADS and this is how you integrate it with OpenLDAP schema and MS Kerboeros." That is going to be a _joke_ because you're already saying Samba should _only_ be integrated under ADS as a domain member and standard UNIX/Linux auth/dir/name services should have _no_part_ in it! We _have_to_ have an enterprise Linux exam that is the _basis_ for interoperability. And that means we need to base all other exams on that. We can still have it developed side-by-side with the Samba objectives, but there needs to be that separation. The problem with 95% of Linux consultants I run into is that they don't understand how Samba works _outside_ the share. ;) -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------- The existence of Linux has far more to do with the breakup of AT&T's monopoly than anything Microsoft has ever done. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
