"Marcus Magalhaes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's another point of having the year appended to the certification. > > If you're applying to, say LPIC-2/2005 in 2006 and LPI launches LPIC-2/2007 > just before you take the 2nd exam, we should have: > > - LPIC-2/2005 exams concurring with LPIC-2/2007. I don't see any problem here > - LPIC-2/2005 is still a valid certification, despite being a bit > outdated. No fundamental > problem here. After all, it's 2006 and you've got that you paid > and applied for. > > As discussed before, you could also take a simpler/cheaper exam and get a > certification "upgrade" to LPIC-2/2007.
If we do this, I think that the appended year would just be to indicate when the cert was awarded. Otherwise, the determination of the certification is still the same. For example, someone that has LPIC-1/2005 plus a 201 (in 2005) that passes the 202 in 2007, would get the LPIC-2/2007 certification. I don't see the exams changing so radically that this wouldn't be a reasonable thing to do. Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
