On Thu, 8/14/08, G. Matthew Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, forgot to mention this. 
> You may just not have the xdm package installed.  I'm
> pretty certain that xdm comes as part of the whole X app suite.

Actually, as of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, only a subset
of Xorg is shipped, with GNOME and KDE frameworks providing any
missing capabilities.   I don't believe xdm is shipped anymore.
Fedora maintains a X:1 package relationship to RHEL, and there
is no xorg-x11-xdm package.  Furthermore, "yum whatprovides" is
not coming back with anything for /etc/X11/xdm nor /etc/xdm.

As always, if anyone is wondering why Red Hat does something,
Bugzilla is a great resource for almost a dozen years of publicly
open decisions.  Red Hat really does not support running a GUI
on RHEL 5+ except via GNOME or KDE.  But Fedora, which has a 
superset of packages, still does ship, and support other
frameworks (e.g., XFCE) as well as various window managers
without full frameworks.

> Looking at debian unstable and testing, there is still an
> xdm package (probably more useful for the icewm, xfce, et
> al users) and they've left the files in /etc/X11/xdm.
> Can anyone confirm/deny the locations of the g/kdm files on
> other distros?

In general, the 100% freely distributable, 0% indemnification
natures of Debian and Fedora always great test beds.  It helps
that nearly all other packages-based distros (which would
not include source-builds, like Gentoo**) are based on those
two.

The sole, other except may be OpenSUSE, of which I haven't
studied it's redistribution/indemnification in awhile.  But
given Novell's marketshare, and the amount of GPL that Novell
puts it, it's always a 3rd consideration when it comes to
comparison.

**NOTE:  I'm not dismissing Gentoo from consideration.  Anyone
who has seen me post in the past, my view is quite the opposite.
It's just radically different being a ports/source-build,
instead of YAPD (yet another packages distro), and does not use
similar backend/frontend package management systems.

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to