On 10-09-13 09:34 PM, Gregory D. Rosenberg wrote: > On 9/13/2010 8:07 PM, Etienne Goyer wrote: >> - Sendmail in depth, focusing on the traditional interface, and possibly > When you say traditional interface are you speaking of the commercial or > open source product.
Open source only. I do not think LPI should cover *any* proprietary piece of software. When I say "traditional" interface, I am talking about sendmail -oi, sendmail -q, mailq, etc. In fact, this is already covered in LPIC-2. > Knowing the protocol well enough to perform diagnostic tests from a > telnet prompt would be something I would minimally expect. Understanding > the protocol well enough to know the interfaction at the packet level > between the client and server might be a reasonable expectation. If you > don't know these two it can be rather tough to troubleshoot a good many > problems. Lastly the knowledge of what to look for in logs. Again in a > general sense. Fully agreed. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
