On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Alessandro Selli <[email protected] > wrote:
> I'm beginning to feel the need of a four-tiered LPI Certification path > (LPIC-1: Basic Linux for End-users, LPIC-2: Advanced Linux for End-users > and Basic Linux Administration, LPIC-3: Advanced Linux Administration > and LPIC-4: Linux in an Enterprise Environment), or maybe a three-step > certification process for LPIC-1 and -2 instead of the present two-step > one. Linux indeed is a huge topic, and it keep growing at an ever > faster pace. > And now the meta-discussions begin. Oh boy. ;) I know the LPIC-1 outlined above looks like Linux Essentials, but > everything technical LE covers is also covered by LPIC-1, so LE does not > help slimming down the number of LPIC-* objectives. > I don't know ... LPI was worked for a decade and a half ... so what's the problem in its history? I think too many people are disappointed that their favorite brand name or technology doesn't get put into an exam. Nothing's going to solve that. It's easy to shotgun manage this, but I would never want to step in the shoes of Matt (or Scott for that matter) any day. God knows I couldn't keep my mouth shut at times like they do. ;) -- Bryan J Smith - Professional, Technical Annoyance b.j.smith at ieee.org - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
