Hi Ingo, On 02/16/2014 11:35 PM, Ingo Wichmann wrote:
> But my impression is: this is not discussed and decided here. We'll be > presented with a result. Right now there is a survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2014-LPIC-Objectives) out there that specifically asks for the desirable changes to systemd, upstart and sysv init coverage in LPIC-1 (first question).This survey is not just a dummy, it is highly considered in exam development. Also, once the result from the survey are known, there will be the usual JTA to determine the relevance of the distinct objectives, with respect to the survey. In my opinion we will have to deal with both systemd and sysv init for several years. We also should consider the point in time in which the exams will be pushed to the market and how that aligns with "enterprise distributions" releasing with systemd. Once in the field, the objectives will remain unchanged for around 2.5 years, which is quite a long time, maybe too long to keep systemd at a minimum weight. Also, there will be a window of several years in which an LPIC-1 candidate may be faced by both "older" systems using sysv init and recent installations using systemd. So, i personally would advice to have both systemd and sysv init in the next LPIC-1 objectives in quite high intense, but I'm pretty sure the survey and the JTA will have the last words regarding that. And both are open for participation :-) Regards, Fabian -- Fabian Thorns ( [email protected] ) * Consultant ( Linux, Networks, Virtualization, HA -- www.xamira.de ) * Author ( www.IPv6-Handbuch.DE ) _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
