On 29/01/2014 10:55, Ingo Wichmann wrote: > Hi, > > Am 27.01.2014 21:15, schrieb Anselm Lingnau:
[...] >> Finally, even Ubuntu will probably have to use large swathes of systemd >> because other parts of the system require the infrastructure. They may >> continue doing without systemd as PID 1, but even that isn't actually >> certain. >> Right now the Canonical people are trying by hook and by crook to get Debian >> to use Upstart as the default init system, but if that doesn't go through >> then , Ubuntu too >> Upstart is essentially dead; it just hasn't fallen over yet. Upstart has >> known >> major design shortcomings that have not been addressed for years. > > That's not so much an upstart vs. systemd argument. If we want to cover > systemd more than we do now (see 101.3), then we'll have to introduce a > bunch of new techniques like socket activation and cgroups. > > Adding upstart basics on top of that is not very much content compared to > that. Well, after Debian (http://beta.slashdot.org/submission/3276759/bdale-garbee-supports-systemd-as-default-for-debian) Ubuntu too capitulated: http://www.zdnet.com/after-linux-civil-war-ubuntu-to-adopt-systemd-7000026373/ It's going to be a systemd-only world soon. I think we'd better be ready by the time it will be over (i.e., when the next stable Debian and Ubuntu releases are out). Bye, -- Alessandro Selli Tel: 340.839.73.05 http://alessandro.route-add.net, VOIP: sip:[email protected] Chiavi PGP/GPG keys: B7FD89FD, 4A904FD9 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
