Hi everybody,

G. Matthew Rice <m...@starnix.com> écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Anselm Lingnau
> <anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de> wrote:
> > So far this list has been suspiciously silent, but if you go to the LPI wiki
> > you will find a page called http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-1_Objectives_V4 . 
> > In
> 
> Here is the latest draft of the LPIC-1 objectives:
> 
>     http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-1_Objectives_V4

So I'm going to break the silence.

Let's talk about 101 first.

I've already said that a few years ago but the order of the
objectives is not logical.  The current 103 topic should be
covered first because the command line is heavily used in topics
101 and 102.  When I said that before, I was told that order was
irrelevant and that it's the trainers role to put things back in
the correct order.  So be it, that's already what I do.  But what
about people who do self-training? Can they stand back enough to
do this by themselves? Book authors have also to put things back
in the correct order, which makes it difficult to compare book
contents and objectives.  Moreover, what's the point in having
objectives in an unlogical order?

I would suggest to put 103 first and reorder (that implies
renumbering) it that way:

103.1
103.8
103.3
103.5
103.6
103.4
103.2
103.7

Basic shell first.  Then vi because file management needs
files...  And it's a good idea to deal with vi soon so that
people can use it to take notes.  Then file management.  Then
processes.  Then and only then pipes because ps | grep allows for
great exercises.

At least vi much sooner that now and 103.4 before 103.2 (pipes
before filters, that makes sense).

Let's get to the details now.

In 103.1, . and source would make more sense in 105.2.  Is exec
really useful (if it is, I would also suggest to move it to
105.2)?

In 103.2, is the pr command (designed for matrix printers, which
are seldom used today) really useful? I also doubt expand, fmt,
join, paste, split and unexpand are heavily used.  On the other
hand, more and less are useful filters, which are not listed
here.

In 103.3, xz should be added to the list of compression programs.

The title for topic 102, "Linux Installation and Package
Management", is not accurate.  Linux installation is not dealt
with.

I still find it hard to deal with shared libraries with people
with no knowledge of C programming.  Let's face it, most systems
administrators nowadays know nothing about C and the POSIX API,
which also makes their understanding of the operating system much
more superficial.  Does the 102.3 subtopic, with only 1 question
in the exam, needs to be maintained here? It would make much more
sense in 201.

Enough for 101, let's move to 102.

In 105.1, /etc/bash.bashrc is missing in the awfully long list of
bash configuration files (yes, I'm not a bash fan, zsh rocks!).

In 106.1, should xhost still be covered given its coarse
security?  Basic knowledge of xauth should replace it, knowing
that ssh -X automatically does everything necessary.

In 107.1, vipw is dearly missing...

In 109.2, configuration files (/etc/network/interfaces,
/etc/sysconfig/network and
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*) should be covered (they
are used by ifup, which is in the objectives).

109.4 should immediately follow 109.2 and so
/etc/resolv.conf, /etc/hosts and /etc/nsswitch.conf should not be
covered in 109.2.

In 110.2, shouldn't inetd and xinetd be removed? I think they
haven't been used by default on any distribution for quite some
time now.  Standalone daemons are the default now (even if I
still launch my UW IMAP from inetd, but that's me).

-- 
Marc Baudoin
Linagora formation - responsable pédagogique
http://formation.linagora.com/

La présente transmission contient des informations
confidentielles appartenant à Linagora, exclusivement destinées
au(x) destinataire(s) identifié(s) ci-dessus. Si vous n'en faites
pas partie, toute reproduction, distribution ou divulgation de
tout ou partie des informations de cette transmission, ou toute
action effectuée sur la base de celles-ci vous sont formellement
interdites. Si vous avez reçu cette transmission par erreur, nous
vous remercions de nous en avertir et de la détruire de votre
système d'information.

The present transmission contains privileged and confidential
information belonging to Linagora, exclusively intended for the
recipient(s) thereabove identified. If you are not one of these
aforementioned recipients, any reproduction, distribution,
disclosure of said information in whole or in part, as well as
any action undertaken on the basis of said information are
strictly prohibited. If you received the present transmission by
mistake, please inform us and destroy it from your messenging and
information systems.
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to