Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> écrit : > > It's because the objectives are not in *any* order. They form a simple > list of stuff that a minimally qualified candidate ought to know. > > It is true that the objectives have names starting with numbers and that > you can sort them by those numbers. But I don't believe you should take > that to mean they follow a strict sequence for teaching purposes. To > illustrate better, you can remove the numbers and sort the objective > names alphabetically - you don't get a sensible sequence doing it that > way either. > > So the problem here is not trying to understand the sequence, the error > is in assuming there is a sequence where there is none. It's not a > syllabus, it's a bunch of stuff (not even a list). > > It has always been the case that training providers and authors of > training materials must present their content in whatever order they > feel makes sense to them and their students. That's what I found when I > was developing materials and teaching - dispense entirely with the > published objective numbers, do it my way, and make sure all the subject > matter was covered.
That's what I also do. But why have objectives in a random order when they could be presented in an order that makes sense? Why make it hard to compare training material (because their authors chose different orders) when we all could have an order everybody agrees with? All my trainees have been uncomfortable with 103 as it is. When I explain to them that I'm going to reorder subtopics, they all find that annoying because they might have a book that chose a different ordering and because it's cumbersome to them to align all of that with the objectives. Why make things difficult when it would be easy to make them simpler? -- Marc Baudoin Linagora formation - responsable pédagogique http://formation.linagora.com/ La présente transmission contient des informations confidentielles appartenant à Linagora, exclusivement destinées au(x) destinataire(s) identifié(s) ci-dessus. Si vous n'en faites pas partie, toute reproduction, distribution ou divulgation de tout ou partie des informations de cette transmission, ou toute action effectuée sur la base de celles-ci vous sont formellement interdites. Si vous avez reçu cette transmission par erreur, nous vous remercions de nous en avertir et de la détruire de votre système d'information. The present transmission contains privileged and confidential information belonging to Linagora, exclusively intended for the recipient(s) thereabove identified. If you are not one of these aforementioned recipients, any reproduction, distribution, disclosure of said information in whole or in part, as well as any action undertaken on the basis of said information are strictly prohibited. If you received the present transmission by mistake, please inform us and destroy it from your messenging and information systems. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
