Alessandro Selli wrote:

> My vote is in favour of CIDR and VLSM notation, and against mention of
> A, B and C network classes.

I think it's a complete no-brainer that the principles of CIDR should be part 
of the exam. I don't think »VLSM notation« is even a thing.

Our training materials mention the archaic network classes, mostly because (a) 
they don't exactly take long to explain, and (b) people may come across them 
in some places, e.g., the way ifconfig assigns default network masks. I'll 
keep that content in the book no matter what the exam objectives say.

> I understand that IANA assignes IPv4 blocks as classes and the way in
> ​-arpa​
> .add​
> ​r zones work, but this is knowledge of sysadmin level, not of LPIC-1
> (plain user) level.

Also, RFC 2317.

Anselm
-- 
Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen
anselm.ling...@linupfront.de, +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de
Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany
Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to