Justin Keller \wrote: > There's also the debate over which is best >
Indeed. And even trying to be objective is difficult. One objective methods -- of several -- is to look at busybox. If busybox acts a certain way, or takes after -- or even provides a link as a replacement for a specific command -- then it's very likely to be ubiquitous on all systems. Now we've been spoiled the last few years with Dracut including full bash and several commands. Although busybox is often still included for most things that don't ship, when it comes to building an initramfs image. - bjs P.S. One of my favorite things to do (torture?) is to sit a sysadmin down on a system that only has busybox. It gets very interesting. I don't do it to so much as eliminate a candidate but to see how creative some of the best candidates are, which often allows them to separate themselves from others. But tha'ts just me. -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith E-mail: b.j.smith at ieee.org or me at bjsmith.me
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
