On 8/22/19 12:07 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > no substantive changes, we want to agree with you guys before > any substantive changes are made, so that ISO LSB === LF LSB. > > Keld
I understand the benefits in genreal of such a staged plan, but what remains of the core team is concerned that the current state of LSB is enough out of date (and out of use: there was only very minimal uptake of LSB 5.0 in industry, while the now 8-year-old 4.1 was far more popular) that it's maybe not in a state that makes it a good candidate for ISO standardization. _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
