Mats, I never could think you ever say this J We were fans of LSB, you remember?
Hug you guys! Vladimir -- Sent from mobile На 22 авг. 2019 г., 21:00, в 21:00, Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> написал:п>On 8/22/19 12:07 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> no substantive changes, we want to agree with you guys before >> any substantive changes are made, so that ISO LSB === LF LSB. >> >> Keld > >I understand the benefits in genreal of such a staged plan, but what >remains of the core team is concerned that the current state of LSB is >enough out of date (and out of use: there was only very minimal uptake >of LSB 5.0 in industry, while the now 8-year-old 4.1 was far more >popular) that it's maybe not in a state that makes it a good candidate >for ISO standardization. >_______________________________________________ >lsb-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
_______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
